Course Type | Course Code | No. Of Credits |
---|---|---|
Foundation Core | SHS201724 | 4 |
Semester and Year Offered: Monsoon semester, 2nd year
Course Coordinator and Team: Deepti Sachdev; Anshumita Pandey
Email of course coordinator: deepti[at]aud[dot]ac[dot]in
Pre-requisites:
Aim: As it traverses then through three words – Childhood, Identity and Society – and how they come to impact one another, the course offers the student a glimpse of the deeply political discourse that surrounds and constructs childhood, impacts the everyday of the child, on one hand and on the other takes one to a critical engagement with the psychological processes of infancy and childhood - ‘the earliest’ and ‘the deepest’ within. CIS marks a re-turn to one’s ‘foundations (in observation)’ located in a psychosocial matrix that allows us to see each individual located within a culture and having a privately evolved but structured culture of his/her own. With a reading of Burman, Nieuwenhuys, Nandy and others, we begin by locating childhood within a confluence of discourses – historical, economic, legal, political. The social construction of childhood then marks the first entry into the world of the child and the themes that populate it. This is followed by a turn to Winnicott and Erikson who take the student to the ‘bi-personal field’ of the mother and child and the subjective processes of infancy and childhood. We get glimpses into the absoluteness of dependence, the pleasure – pain of separation, the arrival of ‘I’ and ‘me’ – the relational beginnings of psyche - ‘mind’ when it could at best ‘sense’ things. We find ourselves wondering - What is the ‘nature of the child’s tie to the mother’? ‘What is trauma for the child?’ ‘Why do children play?’ ‘Is there a relationship between playing and reality’? Through readings, film analyses and case discussions, we visit how a child, helped by the mother’s formative response begins to make the world his own, how playing – at once precarious and robust – allows the child to consolidate his being, to find a way to exist as oneself and relate to the other as oneself, how in this space marked by a peculiar concentration that allows one to be lost, the child is creating a personal idiom that is alive and ‘feels real’. Erikson detailing a similar process that enables experiences to be organized in an individual ego gives to us the basics of identity, its formation and sensitively makes us see how such consolidation is routed through a culture’s collective behavior - historical memory, mythology, rituals or avoidance - that closely inform individual experience. Here one is not merely engaging with an oversimplified analogy of the relationship between the individual and the collective but making a case for how an individual, a child, is at all times an organism, an ego and a member of a society - each a crucial dimension of experience out of which identity is knitted. A special focus in the course becomes ‘childhood at the margins’ that we trace through individual life stories and their complex realities.
Course Outcomes: By the end of the course, the student is expected to:
Brief description of modules/ Main modules:
Course Description: As it traverses then through three words – Childhood, Identity and Society – and how they come to impact one another, the course offers the student a glimpse of the deeply political discourse that surrounds and constructs childhood, impacts the everyday of the child, on one hand and on the other takes one to a critical engagement with the psychological processes of infancy and childhood - ‘the earliest’ and ‘the deepest’ within. CIS marks a re-turn to one’s ‘foundations (in observation)’ located in a psychosocial matrix that allows us to see each individual located within a culture and having a privately evolved but structured culture of his/her own. With a reading of Nieuwenhuys, Nandy, Marcuse to name a few, we begin by locating childhood within a confluence of discourses – historical, economic, legal, political. The social construction of childhood then marks the first entry into the world of the child and the themes that populate it. This is followed by a turn to Winnicott, Stern and Erikson who take the student to the ‘bi-personal field’ of the mother and child and the subjective processes of infancy and childhood. We get glimpses into the absoluteness of dependence, the pleasure – pain of separation, the arrival of ‘I’ and ‘me’ – the relational beginnings of psyche - ‘mind’ when it could at best ‘sense’ things. We find ourselves wondering - What is the ‘nature of the child’s tie to the mother’? ‘What is trauma for the child?’ ‘Why do children play?’ ‘Is there a relationship between playing and reality’? Through readings, film analyses and case discussions, we visit how a child, helped by the mother’s formative response begins to make the world his own, how playing – at once precarious and robust – allows the child to consolidate his being, to find a way to exist as oneself and relate to the other as oneself, how in this space marked by a peculiar concentration that allows one to be lost, the child is creating a personal idiom that is alive and ‘feels real’. Erikson detailing a similar process that enables experiences to be organized in an individual ego gives to us the basics of identity, its formation and sensitively makes us see how such consolidation is routed through a culture’s collective behavior - historical memory, mythology, rituals or avoidance - that closely inform individual experience. Here one is not merely engaging with an oversimplified analogy of the relationship between the individual and the collective but making a case for how an individual, a child, is at all times an organism, an ego and a member of a society - each a crucial dimension of experience out of which identity is knitted. A special focus in the course becomes ‘childhood at the margins’ that we trace through individual life stories and their complex realities.
Brief Description of Modules:
Unit 1: What is this thing called the child?
The opening unit of the course is meant to engage the student in a critical discussion around the constructed and deeply political nature of the discourse around childhood. An anasemic reading of ‘development’ – particularly as it is deployed in a structuration of ‘children’s lifeworlds’ – informs this discussion. With a close reading of writings by Olga Nieuwenhuys, Herbert Marcuse and others, the attempt is to destabilize a naturalized single story of childhood.
Reading List:
Additional Reference:
Unit 2: The child in the Indian Tradition
In continuation with the opening themes, the second unit too attempts to locate the attitudes and practices – the received ‘good sense’ – around childhood as we explore writings grounded within the Indian socio-cultural milieu. We attempt to locate the history of childhood in India and see childhood caught between traditional and modern scripts.
Reading List:
Unit 3: The inner world
Foregrounding the work of D.W. Winnicott and Daniel Stern, we take a closer look at the baby as a person and psychic accomplishments in this journey. We explore some critical themes as regards infantile experience:
Reading List:
Additional Reference:
Unit 4: The Metaphor of Play
The aliveness of self and identity is explored through playful and creative living. We shift from the use/ content of play to the significance of playing in life: as creating a self idiom, as a space of working through, as communication, as actively setting up a relationship with reality and with social scripts that populate the everyday. A crucial emphasis of the unit is on a child not being able to play. What is the work of therapy at such a moment? What substitutes playing? What is the relationship of this moment to a therapist’s own ability to play?
Reading List:
Additional Reference:
Unit 5: Steps In Identity Formation: Development in Erikson’s Psychology
A closer look at Erikson’s Life cycle approach to appreciate further the complex interplay between self and society.
Reading List:
Assessment Details with weights: